Claude 4.8 Opus vs Qwen3.7-Max
Direct spec comparison of Claude 4.8 Opus (from Anthropic) and Qwen3.7-Max (from Alibaba). Want a 3- or 4-way comparison? Open the multi-model tool →
 Claude 4.8 OpusAnthropic |  Qwen3.7-MaxAlibaba | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Family | Claude | Qwen |
| Release date | 2026-05-28 | 2026-05-20 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Modality | text, vision | text |
| License | proprietary | proprietary |
| Source | proprietary | proprietary |
| Description | Anthropic's flagship hybrid-reasoning model — Opus 4.8 pushes coding and AI-agent workflows further (agentic coding 69.2% vs 64.3% on 4.7; multidisciplinary reasoning 57.9% vs 54.7%). 1M-token context, $5/$25 per MTok pricing held flat from Opus 4.7. Introduces Dynamic Workflows for Claude Code (research preview). GA on Anthropic API (`claude-opus-4-8`), AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, Microsoft Foundry, and GitHub Copilot. | Alibaba's flagship agent model — 1M-token context, extended-thinking mode, 56.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 (5th overall, #1 Chinese). 50.8% on Terminal-Bench Hard. Designed for long-horizon agent workloads (hundreds-to-thousands of steps). Closed-weight, $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens. |
| Links | ||
| Benchmarks | ||
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83.7% |
| GPQA-D | — | 83.0% |
| HumanEval | — | 93.9% |
| Aider | — | 78.4% |
| AIME-25 | — | 90.4% |
| LiveCB | — | 71.0% |
More like this
Looking for a different head-to-head? Build your own comparison on the multi-model tool.
Or see all Claude 4.8 Opus details / Qwen3.7-Max details.